Does size matter in prostate cancer? A cross-sectional study on genital dimensions in Caucasian men

¿Importa el tamaño en el cáncer de próstata? Un estudio transversal sobre las dimensiones genitales en hombres caucásicos

Background: Testosterone is crucial in male genital development during puberty. This study primarily aimed to compare genital size in Caucasian men with and without clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The secondary aim was to assess genital size differences in csPCa patients stratified by tumor grade. Methods: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study on consecutive patients undergoing prostate biopsy. Each patient underwent systematic and cognitive-targeted transrectal biopsy. csPCa was defined as PCa with Gleason Score (GS) ≥7, tumor volume ≥0.5 cc, or extra-prostatic extension; other PCa and negative biopsies were classified as non-csPCa. Penile length was measured with the stretched test, and testicular volume by ultrasonography. Results: A total of 156 patients (64 csPCa and 92 non-csPCa) were enrolled. Median age was comparable between groups (68.9 vs. 66.6 years; p = 0.289). Median (IQR) stretched penile length (SPL) was 15.0 (14.0–16.3) cm in the csPCa group and 15.0 (13.0–15.2) cm in the non-csPCa group (p = 0.301). Median (IQR) right testicular volume was 12 (10–14) cc in both groups (p = 0.752), while left testicular volume was 10 (7–13) cc in the csPCa group and 12 (10–14) cc in the non-csPCa group (p = 0.172). Among csPCa patients, those with GS >7 had a longer SPL (16.0 (15–17) cm) compared to GS = 7 patients (14.5 (14–15) cm) (p = 0.012), with no significant differences in testicular volume. Conclusions: In Caucasian men, genital dimensions did not differ between those with and without csPCa. Within the csPCa group, longer SPL was observed in patients with higher-grade tumors. These findings suggest a possible association between genital size and tumor aggressiveness, which warrants further investigation.

Resumen

Antecedentes: La testosterona desempeña un papel fundamental en el desarrollo genital masculino durante la pubertad. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue comparar las dimensiones genitales en varones caucásicos con y sin cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo (CPCs). Como objetivo secundario, se evaluaron las diferencias en las dimensiones genitales de los pacientes con CPCs estratificados según el grado tumoral. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional y transversal en pacientes consecutivos sometidos a biopsia prostática . Todos los pacientes fueron sometidos a biopsia prostática sistemática y dirigida cognitiva por vía transrectal. El CPCs se definió como CP con puntuación de Gleason (GS) ≥7, volumen tumoral ≥0.5 cc o extensión extraprostática; el resto de los casos y las biopsias negativas se clasificaron como no CPCs. La longitud peneana en estiramiento (LPE) se midió clínicamente y el volumen testicular mediante ecografía. Resultados: Se incluyeron 156 pacientes (64 CPCs y 92 no CPCs). La mediana de edad fue comparable entre grupos (68.9 vs. 66.6 años; p = 0.289). La LPE mediana (RIQ) fue de 15.0 (14.0–16.3) cm en el grupo con CPCs y de 15.0 (13.0–15.2) cm en el grupo sin CPCs (p = 0.301). El volumen testicular derecho fue de 12 (10–14) cc en ambos grupos (p = 0.752), mientras que el izquierdo fue de 10 (7–13) cc en el grupo con CPCs y de 12 (10–14) cc en el grupo sin CPCs (p = 0.172). Entre los pacientes con CPCs, aquellos con GS >7 presentaron una LPE mediana (RIQ) de 16.0 (15–17) cm frente a 14.5 (14–15) cm en los pacientes con GS = 7 (p = 0.012), sin diferencias significativas en el volumen testicular. Conclusiones: En varones caucásicos, las dimensiones genitales no difirieron entre quienes presentaban o no CPCs. Sin embargo, dentro del grupo con CPCs, los pacientes con tumores de mayor grado mostraron una LPE más larga. Estos hallazgos sugieren una posible asociación entre el tamaño genital y la agresividad tumoral, que merece ser explorada en investigaciones futuras.

Androgens; Clinically significant prostate cancer; Penile length; Tumor grade

Palabras Clave

Andrógenos; Cáncer de próstata clínicamente significativo; Longitud peneana; Grado tumoral

[1] Adeloye D, David RA, Aderemi AV, Iseolorunkanmi A, Oyedokun A, Iweala EE, et al. An estimate of the incidence of prostate cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11: e0153496.

[2] Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021; 71: 209–249.

[3] Bergengren O, Pekala KR, Matsoukas K, Fainberg J, Mungovan SF, Bratt O, et al. 2022 update on prostate cancer epidemiology and risk factors—a systematic review. European Urology. 2023; 84: 191–206.

[4] Zhou Y, Bolton EC, Jones JO. Androgens and androgen receptor signaling in prostate tumorigenesis. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology. 2015; 54: R15–R29.

[5] Dess RT, Hartman HE, Mahal BA, Soni PD, Jackson WC, Cooperberg MR, et al. Association of black race with prostate cancer-specific and other-cause mortality. JAMA Oncology. 2019; 5: 975–983.

[6] Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA; Grading Committee. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2016; 40: 244–252.

[7] Devasia TP, Mariotto AB, Nyame YA, Etzioni R. Estimating the number of men living with metastatic prostate cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2023; 32: 659–665.

[8] Barboza RA, da Silva EA, Ruellas T, Damião R. Anthropometric study of penile length in self-declared Brazilians regarding the color of the skin as white or black: the study of a myth. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2018; 30: 43–47.

[9] Rebbeck TR. Prostate cancer disparities by race and ethnicity: from nucleotide to neighborhood. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 2018; 8: a030387.

[10] Khan S, Somani B, Lam W, Donat R. Establishing a reference range for penile length in Caucasian British men: a prospective study of 609 men. BJU International. 2012; 109: 740–744.

[11] Bahk JY, Jung JH, Jin LM, Min SK. Cut-off value of testes volume in young adults and correlation among testes volume, body mass index, hormonal level, and seminal profiles. Urology. 2010; 75: 1318–1323.

[12] Richard A, Rohrmann S, Zhang X, Eichholzer M, Basaria S, Selvin E, et al. Racial variation in sex steroid hormone concentration in black and white men: a meta-analysis. Andrology. 2014; 2: 428–435.

[13] Herman-Giddens ME, Steffes J, Harris D, Slora E, Hussey M, Dowshen SA, et al. Secondary sexual characteristics in boys: data from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings Network. Pediatrics. 2012; 130: e1058–e1068.

[14] World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310: 2191–2194.

[15] Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, et al. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. European Urology. 2019; 76: 340–351.

[16] Belladelli F, Del Giudice F, Glover F, Mulloy E, Muncey W, Basran S, et al. Worldwide temporal trends in penile length: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Men’s Health. 2023; 41: 848–860.

[17] Case LD, Ambrosius WT. Power and sample size. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2007; 404: 377–408.

[18] Habibzadeh F. Data distribution: normal or abnormal? Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2024; 39: e35.

[19] Castaño-Vinyals G, Carrasco E, Lorente JA, Sabaté Y, Cirac-Claveras J, Pollán M, et al. Anogenital distance and the risk of prostate cancer. BJU International. 2012; 110: E707–E710.

[20] Ross R, Bernstein L, Judd H, Hanisch R, Pike M, Henderson B. Serum testosterone levels in healthy young black and white men. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1986; 76: 45–48.

[21] Hu H, Odedina FT, Reams RR, Lissaker CT, Xu X. Racial differences in age-related variations of testosterone levels among US males: potential implications for prostate cancer and personalized medication. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2015; 2: 69–76.

[22] Perez-Cornago A, Appleby PN, Pischon T, Tsilidis KK, Tjønneland A, Olsen A, et al. Tall height and obesity are associated with an increased risk of aggressive prostate cancer: results from the EPIC cohort study. BMC Medicine. 2017; 15: 115.

[23] Löppenberg B, Roghmann F, Brock M, von Bodmann C, Michels CJ, Noldus J, et al. Clinical and histopathological parameters of prostate cancer: influence of anthropometric indices. Urologe A. 2015; 54: 22–27. (In German)

[24] MacInnis RJ, English DR. Body size and composition and prostate cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Cancer Causes & Control. 2006; 17: 989–1003.