Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Erectile function after penile fracture: clinical and predictive insights
Función eréctil tras la fractura de pene: perspectivas clínicas y predictivas
1Department of Urology, Ankara Etlik Integrated Health Campus, 06170 Ankara, Türkiye
2Department of Urology, Bayindir Healthcare Group Sogutozu Hospital, 06530 Ankara, Türkiye
DOI: 10.22514/j.androl.2026.018 Vol.24,Issue 2,June 2026 pp.50-57
Submitted: 08 April 2026 Accepted: 27 May 2026
Published: 30 June 2026
*Corresponding Author(s): Metin Yığman E-mail: metin.yigman@saglik.gov.tr
Background: This study aimed to identify the clinical and demographic factors associated with postoperative erectile dysfunction in patients undergoing early surgical repair for penile fracture. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgical treatment for penile fracture between January 2015 and January 2025 at two tertiary care centers. Patients with confirmed tunical rupture during surgery and known preoperative erectile status were included. Erectile function was assessed using the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) at baseline and at 6 months postoperatively. Patients with a ≥4-point decrease in IIEF-5 score at month 6 were defined as having developed erectile dysfunction (ED). Associations between clinical/demographic variables and ED development were analyzed statistically. Results: A total of 64 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 43.0 ± 12.2 years. Early surgical exploration was performed in all cases. At 6 months, 21.9% of patients had significant postoperative ED. Univariate analysis revealed that age was the only variable significantly associated with ED (p = 0.0076). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis identified ≥50 years as the optimal age cut-off for predicting ED (Area Under the Curve (AUC): 0.727; sensitivity: 57.1%; specificity: 82.0%). No other clinical variables were found to be significantly associated with postoperative ED. Conclusions: Despite early surgical intervention, a considerable proportion of patients developed ED following penile fracture. Age was the only variable significantly associated with long-term erectile function in our analysis. These findings emphasize the importance of age in both preoperative counseling and postoperative follow-up planning.
Resumen
Antecedentes: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar los factores clínicos y demográficos asociados con la disfunción eréctil postoperatoria en pacientes sometidos a reparación quirúrgica temprana por fractura de pene. Métodos: Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó a pacientes sometidos a tratamiento quirúrgico por fractura de pene entre enero de 2015 y enero de 2025 en dos centros de atención terciaria. Se incluyeron pacientes con ruptura túnica confirmada durante la cirugía y con estado eréctil preoperatorio conocido. La función eréctil se evaluó mediante el Índice Internacional de Función Eréctil de 5 ítems (IIEF-5) al inicio y a los 6 meses del postoperatorio. Los pacientes con una disminución de ≥4 puntos en la puntuación IIEF-5 al mes 6 fueron definidos como portadores de disfunción eréctil desarrollada. Las asociaciones entre las variables clínicas/demográficas y el desarrollo de disfunción eréctil se analizaron estadísticamente. Resultados: Se incluyó un total de 64 pacientes en el estudio. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 43.0 ± 12.2 años. En todos los casos se realizó exploración quirúrgica temprana. A los 6 meses, el 21.9% de los pacientes presentaron disfunción eréctil postoperatoria significativa. El análisis univariante reveló que la edad fue la única variable significativamente asociada con la disfunción eréctil (p = 0.0076). El análisis de la curva de características operativas del receptor (ROC) identificó ≥50 años como el punto de corte de edad óptimo para predecir la disfunción eréctil (Área bajo la curva (AUC): 0.727; sensibilidad: 57.1%; especificidad: 82.0%). No se encontraron otras variables clínicas significativamente asociadas con la disfunción eréctil postoperatoria. Conclusiones: A pesar de la intervención quirúrgica temprana, una proporción considerable de pacientes desarrolló disfunción eréctil tras la fractura de pene. La edad fue la única variable significativamente asociada con la función eréctil a largo plazo en nuestro análisis. Estos hallazgos enfatizan la importancia de la edad tanto en el asesoramiento preoperatorio como en la planificación del seguimiento postoperatorio.
Penile fracture; Erectile dysfunction; Postoperative complications; Functional outcomes
Palabras Clave
Fractura de pene; Disfunción eréctil; Complicaciones postoperatorias; Resultados funcionales
Metin Yığman,Adem Sancı,Berk Yasin Ekenci,Emre Hepşen,Kubilay Sarıkaya. Erectile function after penile fracture: clinical and predictive insightsFunción eréctil tras la fractura de pene: perspectivas clínicas y predictivas. Revista Internacional de Andrología. 2026. 24(2);50-57.
[1] El-Assmy A, El-Tholoth HS, Abou-El-Ghar ME, Mohsen T, Ibrahiem EH. Risk factors of erectile dysfunction and penile vascular changes after surgical repair of penile fracture. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2012; 24: 20–25.
[2] Amer T, Wilson R, Chlosta P, AlBuheissi S, Qazi H, Fraser M, et al. Penile fracture: a meta-analysis. Urologia Internationalis. 2016; 96: 315–329.
[3] Mydlo JH, Hayyeri M, Macchia RJ. Urethrography and cavernosography imaging in a small series of penile fractures: a comparison with surgical findings. Urology. 1998; 51: 616–619.
[4] Kominsky H, Beebe S, Shah N, Jenkins LC. Surgical reconstruction for penile fracture: a systematic review. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2020; 32: 75–80.
[5] Sharma G, Mandal S, Bhowmik P, Gupta P, Bahal B, Sharma PK. Sexual function outcomes and risk factors of erectile dysfunction after surgical repair of penile fracture. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2021; 47: 106–112.
[6] Bulbul E, Gultekin MH, Citgez S, Derekoylu E, Demirbilek M, Akkus E, et al. Penile fracture: tertiary care center experience and long-term complications after immediate repair. Andrology. 2022; 10: 560–566.
[7] Ateyah A, Mostafa T, Nasser TA, Shaeer O, Hadi AA, Al-Gabbar MA. Penile fracture: surgical repair and late effects on erectile function. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2008; 5: 1496–1502.
[8] Ekeke ON, Eke N. Fracture of the penis in the Niger Delta: a clinical study. Journal of West African College of Surgeons. 2014; 4: 1–19.
[9] Ortac M, Özgor F, Caglar U, Esmeray A, Savun M, Sarılar Ö. Older age and a large tunical tear may be predictors of increased erectile dysfunction rates following penile fracture surgery. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2020; 32: 226–231.
[10] Avci IE, Yilmaz H, Cinar NB, Akdas EM, Teke K, Culha MM. Immediately repaired penile fractures: age is the only predictor of postoperative long-term functional outcomes. Sexual Medicine. 2023; 11: qfad048.
[11] Rodriguez D, Li K, Apoj M, Munarriz R. Epidemiology of penile fractures in United States emergency departments: access to care disparities may lead to suboptimal outcomes. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2019; 16: 248–256.
[12] Falcone M, Garaffa G, Castiglione F, Ralph DJ. Current management of penile fracture: an up-to-date systematic review. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2018; 6: 253–260.
[13] Özorak A, Hoşcan MB, Oksay T, Güzel A, Koşar A. Management and outcomes of penile fracture: 10 years’ experience from a tertiary care center. International Urology and Nephrology. 2014; 46: 519–522.
[14] Gazzah W, Najjai Y, Lahouar R, Mzoughi M, Mansi Z, Braiek S. Delayed surgical repair in double penile fracture: insights and outcomes: a case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2024; 117: 109623.
[15] Ouanes Y, Saadi MH, Haj Alouene H, Bibi M, Sellami A, Rhouma SB, et al. Sexual function outcomes after surgical treatment of penile fracture. Sexual Medicine. 2021; 9: 100353.
[16] Keskin ET, Can O, Filtekin YC, Özdemir H, Şahin M, Çeker G, et al. Comparison of erectile and ejaculatory functional outcomes between unilateral and bilateral cavernosal rupture in penile fractures. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2024; 36: 659–664.
[17] Rosen RC, Allen KR, Ni X, Araujo AB. Minimal clinically important differences in the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function scale. European Urology. 2011; 60: 1010–1016.
[18] Barros R, Hampl D, Cavalcanti AG, Favorito LA, Koifman L. Lessons learned after 20 years’ experience with penile fracture. International Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2020; 46: 409–416.
[19] Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: long-term results of surgical treatment. BJU International. 2002; 89: 890–894.
[20] Abdelrasheed A, Elkomy A, Latham J, Ali M. Erectile dysfunction following surgical repair of penile fracture: a literature review of incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Cureus. 2025; 17: e91712.
[21] Geyik S, Onder Yilmaz I, Zubaroglu M, Deger M, Kavak R, Sari H, et al. Prediction of severe erectile dysfunction after penile fracture repair: machine learning analysis results from the reconstruction and trauma working group of the Society of Urological Surgery (RAT-SUS). Sexual Medicine. 2025; 13: qfaf101.
[22] Seals DR, Jablonski KL, Donato AJ. Aging and vascular endothelial function in humans. Clinical Science. 2011; 120: 357–375.
Top