Article Data

  • Views 279
  • Dowloads 41

Original Research

Open Access

Are there benefits of varicocelectomy beyond semen parameters? Effects on sexual function and psychological well-being

¿Existen beneficios de la varicocelectomía más allá de los parámetros seminales? Efectos sobre la función sexual y el bienestar psicológico

  • Hakan Tekinaslan1,*,
  • Ömeri Faruk Mutlu1
  • Osman Kose1
  • Serkan Özcan1
  • Enis Mert Yorulmaz1
  • Sacit Nuri Gorgel1
  • Yigit Akin1

1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, 35360 İzmir, Türkiye

DOI: 10.22514/j.androl.2026.023 Vol.24,Issue 2,June 2026 pp.91-101

Submitted: 22 December 2025 Accepted: 28 April 2026

Published: 30 June 2026

*Corresponding Author(s): Hakan Tekinaslan E-mail: hakan.tekaslan@hotmail.com

Abstract

Background: Varicocele is a common condition associated with impaired spermato-genesis and reduced testosterone production. While varicocelectomy is primarily indicated for infertility, its effect on sexual function and psychological status are less clearly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of varicocelectomy on sexual, hormonal, and psychological outcomes beyond conventional semen parameters. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 81 men who underwent open subinguinal + inguinal varicocelectomy between 2022 and 2025. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative assessments included the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), libido score, Premature Ejaculation Test (PET), nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) grade, serum total testosterone, and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Paired non-parametric tests were used for analysis, and subgroup comparisons were performed according to varicocele laterality (unilateral vs. bilateral). Results: At 6 months, significant postoperative changes were observed in multiple domains. Median serum total testosterone increased from 13.42 (4.23) to 15.04 (1.27) ng/mL (p < 0.001). Median libido score increased from 5 (3) to 8 (2), and PET score increased from 3 (1) to 4 (1) (both p < 0.001). Median IIEF-5 and IELT values remained numerically unchanged, although statistically significant paired differences were observed (both p < 0.001), suggesting that the magnitude of change in these parameters may have been limited. Semen parameters improved significantly in both unilateral and bilateral groups (all p < 0.001), with a between-group difference observed only for postoperative progressive motility. Conclusions: Varicocelectomy was associated with statistically significant changes in multiple sexual, hormonal, psychological, and semen parameters at 6-month follow-up. However, some changes were modest in magnitude and should be interpreted cautiously, particularly given the absence of a control group and the subjective nature of several outcomes.


Resumen

Antecedentes: El varicocele es una condición frecuente asociada con alteraciones en la espermatogénesis y disminución de la producción de testosterona. Aunque la varicocelectomía se indica principalmente por infertilidad, sus efectos sobre la función sexual y el estado psicológico no están completamente definidos. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar el impacto de la varicocelectomía sobre los parámetros sexuales, hormonales y psicológicos más allá de los parámetros seminales convencionales. Métodos: Este estudio retrospectivo de cohorte unicéntrico incluyó a 81 hombres sometidos a varicocelectomía abierta entre 2022 y 2025. Se realizaron evaluaciones preoperatorias y a los 6 meses postoperatorios, incluyendo el índice internacional de función eréctil (IIEF-5), el tiempo de latencia eyaculatoria intravaginal (IELT), la puntuación de libido, el test de eyaculación precoz (PET), el grado de tumescencia peneana nocturna (NPT), los niveles séricos de testosterona total y el inventario de depresión de Beck (BDI). Se utilizaron pruebas no paramétricas para el análisis. Resultados: A los 6 meses se observaron cambios significativos en múltiples parámetros. Los niveles de testosterona, la puntuación de libido y el control eyaculatorio mejoraron significativamente (p < 0.001). Aunque se detectaron diferencias estadísticas en IIEF-5 e IELT, los valores medianos permanecieron prácticamente sin cambios, lo que sugiere un impacto clínico limitado a nivel poblacional. Los parámetros seminales también mejoraron significativamente. Conclusiones: La varicocelectomía se asoció con mejoras en parámetros hormonales, sexuales, psicológicos y seminales. Sin embargo, algunos cambios fueron de magnitud limitada y deben interpretarse con cautela, especialmente considerando la ausencia de grupo control y la naturaleza subjetiva de varios resultados.


Keywords

Varicocelectomy; Sexual function; Erectile dysfunction; Testosterone; Psychological well-being; Ejaculatory latency


Palabras Clave

Varicocelectomía; Función sexual; Disfunción eréctil; Testosterona; Bienestar psicológico; Latencia eyaculatoria


Cite and Share

Hakan Tekinaslan,Ömeri Faruk Mutlu,Osman Kose,Serkan Özcan,Enis Mert Yorulmaz,Sacit Nuri Gorgel,Yigit Akin. Are there benefits of varicocelectomy beyond semen parameters? Effects on sexual function and psychological well-being¿Existen beneficios de la varicocelectomía más allá de los parámetros seminales? Efectos sobre la función sexual y el bienestar psicológico. Revista Internacional de Andrología. 2026. 24(2);91-101.

References

[1] Lomboy JR, Coward RM. The varicocele: clinical presentation, evaluation, and surgical management. Seminars in Interventional Radiology. 2016; 33: 163–169.

[2] Eisenberg ML, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele-induced infertility: newer insights into its pathophysiology. Indian Journal of Urology. 2011; 27: 58–64.

[3] Huang X, Zhao H, Wu X, Liang Y, Guan Q, Luo D, et al. Mechanisms of Leydig cell aging and obesity-related hypogonadism in men: a review. Medical Science Monitor. 2025; 31: e948180.

[4] Najari BB, Introna L, Paduch DA. Improvements in patient-reported sexual function after microsurgical varicocelectomy. Urology. 2017; 110: 104–109.

[5] Kizilkan Y, Duran MB, Kayra MV, Sahin B, Toksoz S, Gultekin MH, et al. The effects of microsurgical varicocelectomy performed for infertility on premature ejaculation. International Urology and Nephrology. 2025; 57: 1425–1431.

[6] Saylam B, Çayan S, Akbay E. Effect of microsurgical varicocele repair on sexual functions and testosterone in hypogonadal infertile men with varicocele. The Aging Male. 2020; 23: 1366–1373.

[7] Neijenhuijs KI, Holtmaat K, Aaronson NK, Holzner B, Terwee CB, Cuijpers P, et al. The international index of erectile function (IIEF)—a systematic review of measurement properties. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2019; 16: 1078–1091.

[8] Nguyen HB, Nguyen CT, Pham MQ, Hoang L, Sansone A, Jannini EA. Perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time: the diagnosis of premature ejaculation among Vietnamese men. Andrology. 2024; 12: 618–623.

[9] Patrick DL, Rowland D, Rothman M. Interrelationships among measures of premature ejaculation: the central role of perceived control. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2007; 4: 780–788.

[10] Carriero C, Dellino M, Campanelli FD, Licchelli M, Loverro G. Psychosexual assessment of transgender individuals during the sex reassignment process: sexual desire, activity, and satisfaction. Health. 2016; 8: 1075–1081.

[11] Goncharov N, Katsya G, Dobracheva A, Nizhnik A, Kolesnikova G, Todua T, et al. Serum testosterone measurement in men: evaluation of modern immunoassay technologies. The Aging Male. 2005; 8: 194–202.

[12] Carney CE, Ulmer C, Edinger JD, Krystal AD, Knauss F. Assessing depression symptoms in those with insomnia: an examination of the Beck Depression Inventory second edition (BDI-II). Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2009; 43: 576–582.

[13] Ulubay M, Bahaettin Ulu M, Akdeniz E. The effect of aging on semen parameters in normozoospermic men: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine. 2022; 20: 955–962.

[14] Fidel MG, Shah J, Bal DS, Ko Y, Roque C, Dhillon H, et al. Outcomes following inguinal and subinguinal urologic procedures under deep intravenous sedation. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2024; 18: 335–340.

[15] Takács T, Szabó A, Kopa Z. Recent trends in the management of varicocele. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14: 5445.

[16] Sheehan MM, Ramasamy R, Lamb DJ. Molecular mechanisms involved in varicocele-associated infertility. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2014; 31: 521–526.

[17] Gonzalez-Daza SJ, Díaz-Hung AM, García-Perdomo HA. Association between varicocele and hypogonadism, or erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2024; 48: 751–759.

[18] Cannarella R, Shah R, Ko E, Kavoussi P, Rambhatla A, Hamoda TAA, et al. Effects of varicocele repair on testicular endocrine function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Men’s Health. 2024; 43: 818–843.

[19] Zohdy W, Ghazi S, Arafa M. Impact of varicocelectomy on gonadal and erectile functions in men with hypogonadism and infertility. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2011; 8: 885–893.

[20] Wang K, Gao Y, Wang C, Liang M, Liao Y, Hu K. Role of oxidative stress in varicocele. Frontiers in Genetics. 2022; 13: 850114.

[21] Podlasek CA, Mulhall J, Davies K, Wingard CJ, Hannan JL, Bivalacqua TJ, et al. Translational perspective on the role of testosterone in sexual function and dysfunction. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2016; 13: 1183–1198.

[22] Fallara G, Capogrosso P, Pozzi E, Belladelli F, Corsini C, Boeri L, et al. The effect of varicocele treatment on fertility in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published prospective trials. European Urology Focus. 2023; 9: 154–161.

[23] Cannarella R, Shah R, Hamoda TAA, Boitrelle F, Saleh R, Gul M, et al. Does varicocele repair improve conventional semen parameters? A meta-analytic study of before-after data. World Journal of Men’s Health. 2023; 42: 92–132.

[24] Asafu-Adjei D, Judge C, Deibert CM, Li G, Stember D, Stahl PJ. Systematic review of the impact of varicocele grade on response to surgical management. Journal of Urology. 2020; 203: 48–56.

[25] Shomarufov AB, Bozhedomov VA, Sorokin NI, Matyukhov IP, Fozilov AA, Abbosov SA, et al. Predictors of microsurgical varicocelectomy efficacy in male infertility treatment: critical assessment and systematization. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2022; 25: 21–28.

[26] Kim SO, Jung H, Park K. Outcomes of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy for painful varicoceles. Journal of Andrology. 2012; 33: 872–875.

[27] Han DY, Yang QY, Chen X, Ouyang B, Yao B, Liu GH, et al. Who will benefit from surgical repair for painful varicocele: a meta-analysis. International Urology and Nephrology. 2016; 48: 1071–1078.

[28] Will MA, Swain J, Fode M, Sonksen J, Christman GM, Ohl D. The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility. Fertility and Sterility. 2011; 95: 841–852.

[29] Zampieri N, Mantovani A, Ottolenghi A, Camoglio FS. Testicular catch-up growth after varicocelectomy: does surgical technique make a difference? Urology. 2009; 73: 289–292.

[30] Esteves SC, Agarwal A. Afterword to varicocele and male infertility: current concepts and future perspectives. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2016; 18: 319–322.

[31] Al-Kandari AM, Khudair A, Arafa A, Zanaty F, Ezz A, El-Shazly M. Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in 100 consecutive cases: spermatic cord vascular anatomy, recurrence and hydrocele outcome analysis. Arab Journal of Urology. 2018; 16: 181–187.

[32] Rotker K, Sigman M. Recurrent varicocele. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2016; 18: 229–233.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top