Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Varicocele grade, laterality, and reproductive outcomes: evidence from a large tertiary-center cohort study
Grado, lateralidad del varicocele y resultados reproductivos: evidencia de un estudio de cohorte en un centro terciario de alta complejidad
1Urology Department, Tashkent State Medical University, 100109 Tashkent, Uzbekistan
2Polyclinics, Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Urology, 100109 Tashkent, Uzbekistan
DOI: 10.22514/j.androl.2025.047 Vol.23,Issue 4,December 2025 pp.89-96
Submitted: 06 June 2025 Accepted: 14 July 2025
Published: 30 December 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Azizbek Shomarufov E-mail: *Correspondence
a.shomarufov@tma.uz
Background: The study aimed to assess the impact of varicocele grade and laterality on semen quality in infertile men and their association with reproductive outcomes following microsurgical varicocelectomy. Methods: This retrospective study included 2871 infertile men diagnosed with clinical varicocele at a tertiary urology center (2005–2022). Varicocele grade (I–III) and laterality (unilateral/bilateral) were classified per World Health Organization (WHO) 2000 guidelines. Semen analysis followed WHO 1999/2010 criteria. A subgroup underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy and was followed for 12 months to assess spontaneous pregnancy and time to conception. Results: Unilateral varicocele was found in 64.9% and bilateral in 35.1%. Grade II varicocele predominated (80.6%), with Grades I and III comprising 11.4% and 8.0%, respectively. Normal semen parameters were observed in 55.5% of patients; the remainder had abnormalities such as asthenozoospermia (28.9%), oligozoospermia (6.9%), and azoospermia (3.9%). Semen quality did not differ significantly across grades or laterality (p > 0.05). Among surgical patients, 40.7% achieved spontaneous pregnancy within 12 months (mean time to conception: 4.3 ± 0.03 months). Neither varicocele grade nor laterality significantly influenced pregnancy rates or timing. Conclusions: Varicocele grade and laterality were not significantly associated with semen quality or postoperative pregnancy outcomes. These findings support individualized patient selection for varicocelectomy, considering broader clinical and reproductive factors rather than varicocele classification alone.
Resumen
Antecedentes: Evaluar el impacto del grado y la lateralidad del varicocele sobre la calidad del semen en hombres infértiles y su asociación con los resultados reproductivos después de la varicocelectomía microquirúrgica. Métodos: Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó a 2871 hombres infértiles diagnosticados con varicocele clínico en un centro urológico terciario (2005–2022). El grado (I–III) y la lateralidad (unilateral/bilateral) del varicocele se clasificaron según las directrices de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) 2000. El análisis seminal siguió los criterios de la OMS 1999/2010. Un subgrupo se sometió a varicocelectomía microquirúrgica y fue seguido durante 12 meses para evaluar el embarazo espontáneo y el tiempo hasta la concepción. Resultados: Se identificó varicocele unilateral en el 64.9% y bilateral en el 35.1%. Predominó el varicocele de grado II (80.6%), mientras que los grados I y III representaron el 11.4% y 8.0%, respectivamente. Se observaron parámetros normales de semen en el 55.5% de los pacientes; el resto presentó anomalías como astenozoospermia (28.9%), oligozoospermia (6.9%) y azoospermia (3.9%). La calidad del semen no difirió significativamente entre los distintos grados ni según la lateralidad (p > 0.05). Entre los pacientes operados, el 40.7% logró embarazo espontáneo dentro de los 12 meses (tiempo medio hasta la concepción: 4.3 ± 0.03 meses). Ni el grado ni la lateralidad del varicocele influyeron significativamente en las tasas de embarazo ni en el tiempo hasta la concepción. Conclusiones: El grado y la lateralidad del varicocele no se asociaron significativamente con la calidad del semen ni con los resultados reproductivos posteriores a la cirugía. Estos hallazgos respaldan la selección individualizada de pacientes para varicocelectomía, considerando factores clínicos y reproductivos más amplios en lugar de basarse únicamente en la clasificación del varicocele.
Varicocele; Varicocelectomy; Semen; Pregnancy
Palabras Clave
Varicocele; Varicocelectomía; Semen; Embarazo
Farkhad Akilov,Shukhrat Giyasov,Azizbek Shomarufov,Shukhrat Mukhtarov,Jasur Yuldashev,Djalal Mirkhamidov. Varicocele grade, laterality, and reproductive outcomes: evidence from a large tertiary-center cohort studyGrado, lateralidad del varicocele y resultados reproductivos: evidencia de un estudio de cohorte en un centro terciario de alta complejidad. Revista Internacional de Andrología. 2025. 23(4);89-96.
[1] Brannigan RE, Hermanson L, Kaczmarek J, Kim SK, Kirkby E, Tanrikut C. Updates to male infertility: AUA/ASRM guideline (2024). The Journal of Urology. 2024; 212: 789–799.
[2] Su JS, Farber NJ, Vij SC. Pathophysiology and treatment options of varicocele: an overview. Andrologia. 2021; 53: e13576.
[3] Cannarella R, Çayan S, Giulioni C, Çeker G, Singh K, Khalafalla K, et al. Impact of varicocele on pregnancy and live birth outcomes in men with clinical varicocele: systematic review of controlled studies. World Journal of Men’s Health. 2025; 43.
[4] Damsgaard J, Joensen UN, Carlsen E, Erenpreiss J, Blomberg Jensen M, Matulevicius V, et al. Varicocele is associated with impaired semen quality and reproductive hormone levels: a study of 7035 healthy young men from six European countries. European Urology. 2016; 70: 1019–1029.
[5] Pallotti F, Paoli D, Carlini T, Vestri AR, Martino G, Lenzi A, et al. Varicocele and semen quality: a retrospective case-control study of 4230 patients from a single centre. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2018; 41: 185–192.
[6] Bozhedomov VA, Shomarufov AB, Bozhedomova GE, D OA, Kamalov DM, Kamalov AA. Varicocele and reproductive function: epidemiology and infertility risk (the eamination of 3632 patients). Urologiia. 2021; 122–128. (In Russian)
[7] Shomarufov AB, Bozhedomov VA, Sorokin NI, Matyukhov IP, Fozilov AA, Abbosov SA, et al. Predictors of microsurgical varicocelectomy efficacy in male infertility treatment: critical assessment and systematization. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2023; 25: 21–28.
[8] Minhas S, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Cocci A, Corona G, Dinkelman-Smit M, et al. European association of urology guidelines on male sexual and reproductive health: 2025 update on male infertility. European Urology. 2025; 87: 601–616.
[9] Tsujimura A, Iijima M, Umemoto Y, Kobayashi H, Komiya A, Shiraishi K, et al. Summary of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Male Infertility by the Japanese Urological Association with the support of the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. International Journal of Urology. 2025; 0: 1–13.
[10] White J, Cartaya S, Black K, Ledesma B, Arbelaez MCS, Muthigi A, et al. Are varicoceles the holy grail of Andrology? International Journal of Impotence Research. 2024; 36: 177–180.
[11] Pasqualotto FF, Lucon AM, De Góes PM, Sobreiro BP, Hallak J, Pasqualotto EB, et al. Relationship between the number of veins ligated in a varicocelectomy with testicular volume, hormonal levels and semen parameters outcome. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2005; 22: 245–249.
[12] Shomarufov AB, Bozhedomov VA, Giyasov SI, Abbosov SA, Kamalov AA. Varicocelectomy: a critical analysis of predictors for male reproductive function recovery. Urologiia. 2020; 148–154. (In Russian)
[13] Huyghe E, Methorst C, Faix A. Varicocele and male infertility. Progrès en Urologie. 2023; 33: 624–635. (In French)
[14] Asafu-Adjei D, Judge C, Deibert CM, Li G, Stember D, Stahl PJ. Systematic review of the impact of varicocele grade on response to surgical management. Journal of Urology. 2020; 203: 48–56.
[15] Machen GL, Johnson D, Nissen MA, Naber E, Sandlow JI. Time to improvement of semen parameters after microscopic varicocelectomy: when it occurs and its effects on fertility. Andrologia. 2020; 52: e13500.
[16] Persad E, O’Loughlin CAA, Kaur S, Wagner G, Matyas N, Hassler-Di Fratta MR, et al. Surgical or radiological treatment for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021; 4: CD000479.
[17] Lima TFN, Frech FS, Patel P, Blachman-Braun R, Ramasamy R. Effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on semen parameters, serum, and intratesticular testosterone levels. BJUI Compass. 2020; 1: 93–99.
[18] Sun X, Wang J, Peng Y, Gao Q, Song T, Yu W, et al. Bilateral is superior to unilateral varicocelectomy in infertile males with left clinical and right subclinical varicocele: a prospective randomized controlled study. International Urology and Nephrology. 2018; 50: 205–210.
[19] Niu Y, Wang D, Chen Y, Pokhrel G, Xu H, Wang T, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome of bilateral and unilateral varicocelectomy in infertile males with left clinical and right subclinical varicocele: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Andrologia. 2018; 50: e13078.
[20] Fathi A, Mohamed O, Mahmoud O, Alsagheer GA, Reyad AM, Abolyosr A, et al. The impact of varicocelectomy on sperm DNA fragmentation and pregnancy rate in subfertile men with normal semen parameters: a pilot study. Arab Journal of Urology. 2021; 19: 186–190.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE)
Índice Bibliográfico Español en Ciencias de la Salud (IBECS)
Scopus: CiteScore 1.7 (2024)
Top